Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62024TN0140

Case T-140/24: Action brought on 4 March 2024 – Xilin Gol League Xiyang Mutton Industry/EUIPO – Baidu Europe (baidu)

OJ C, C/2024/2786, 29.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2786/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2786/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/2786

29.4.2024

Action brought on 4 March 2024 – Xilin Gol League Xiyang Mutton Industry/EUIPO – Baidu Europe (baidu)

(Case T-140/24)

(C/2024/2786)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Xilin Gol League Xiyang Mutton Industry Co. Ltd (Inner Mongolia, China) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, J. Rodríguez-Fuensalida y Carnicero, P. Ramells Higueras, A. Figuerola Moure and P. Muñoz Moreno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Baidu Europe BV (Swalmen, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark baidu – European Union trade mark No 5 398 847

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 January 2024 in joined cases R 373/2023-5 and R 391/2023-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

Uphold the present action for annulment brought against the contested decision;

—

Assess the erroneous application of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the contested decision;

—

Declare the trade mark at issue revoked for all the goods and services in classes 9, 38 and 42;

—

Order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the applicant’s representation costs, associated with these proceedings.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2786/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top